Tag Archives: Alright

Mission: Impossible II

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Date watched: July 13, 2023
Date Reviewed: July 25, 2023

Review

The sequel to the mission franchise is released to us four years after the original film and I don’t recall if I saw this one at the cinema or not. Based on how old I was at the time; I’m thinking that was unlikely. What I do recall however is owning this one on VHS and that it included behind the scenes extras of how the big stunts were filmed.

I also remember that I really liked the film at the time but on reflection I believe that comes from the fact that most of Mission: Impossible II was filmed in Australia and perhaps just being proud my home country was featured.

Since then and with more sequels released, this instalment is the weakest of the lot.

The film is quite disjointed and my major issue with it is the plot. It just doesn’t seem like a case for the Impossible Mission Force. Not only do the stakes not feel high but the actions taken by the IMF don’t seem impossible either. This could have been an intelligence mission the CIA or another agency could have covered.

The whole reason why the IMF is event included is the connection between a scientist on the project in question with Ethan Hunt – a very tenuous link indeed.

The film does have some fantastic action scenes which are very memorable. Now that might be nostalgia talking but when I think this film, I am taken back to the rock-climbing scene at the very beginning of the film and the knife fight sequence in the closing act.

The director, John Woo, also brought his style of repeat shots that slows down the action before letting the sequence run freely and faster. His style isn’t for everyone, and mission may not be his best work but this was a part of a film that I did and still do enjoy.

Lastly some thoughts on the cast.

Thandie Newton and Anthony Hopkins are inserted into the cast where the latter was a rather odd cameo and somewhat unlikable character similar to Kittridge from the first instalment. The former is added as the love interest for a storyline that adds nothing to the overarching plot. Her character while providing some interest is used in such a bizarre way.

It was nice to have Ving Rhames return as Luther however he is paired with the most stereotypical “Aussie” counterpart, it hurts to watch!

This is also the film which introduced me to Richard Roxburgh, whose performance I enjoy in this film, despite the strange accent!

Overall, as a mission film it ticks all the boxes that we expect to see. From locations, use of masks – now with the addition of a voice changing strip you stick on your throat, to action sequences. Yet with all that, Mission: Impossible II fails to hit the mark.

Not the worst film I have seen but it is very middle of the pack viewing.

Rating:  Alright

John Wick: Chapter 4

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Date watched: March 25, 2023
Date Reviewed: March 26, 2023

Review

Saturday night has brought me to both the conclusion of my weeklong catch up of John Wick films and of the series.

I’ll be honest with you; I was a bit nervous going in after finding out in the morning that Chapter 4 had a runtime of 2hrs 49mins, making it the longest in the series. I didn’t know how I was going to get through it, and I was a little afraid of what to say to my friends who were fans of the series.

Watching it at the cinema, on a big screen, with lots of volume, and with an audience the film is targeted towards, certainly enhanced the experience. There were a couple of times that laughter broke out, mostly at audience reactions, and I found that I wasn’t the only one confused as to if the film is meant to be taken seriously or not. The vibe I got is that the audience found the “hilarity” of it.

In Chapter 4, John after being shot off a rooftop by Winston, continues his path to freedom from The High Table. But rather than following any threads already established in the first three films, we are introduced to new characters and plotlines in his quest.

While the franchise has come a long way from its first instalment with improved storyline and acting (albeit the bar was low!), I am left a little confused by how the ‘universe’ created has progressed. It seems to have gone from a secret, somewhat underground society living amongst civilians to now everyone being an assassin. That or the civilized society knows about the order and just doesn’t care. It’s never really been acknowledged, so it falls into one of the attentions to detail gaps the franchise is littered with.

What the John Wick franchise is widely well known for, are the clever and engaging action sequences and Chapter 4 is no exception. There is one absolute stand out sequence set in an abandoned building which uses an overhead shot that includes flamethrowers and is stitched together so seamlessly, you’d think it was a single shot.

And while it’s worth watching this film for that sequence alone, there are many other great action sequences to like.

In answer to the question is this the best in the series? I would have to go with yes. I liked Chapter 2 as well, however Chapter 4 has quite a lot of good action sequences. I do think it runs for longer than is needed, but it wasn’t as hard a slog as I thought that it was going to be. And again there were some clear scenes that weren’t needed to progress the story. There also aren’t really many call backs to the past films, so you could easily get away with not seeing any of them follow along in this last instalment.

If you are planning on seeing John Wick: Chapter 4, I would recommend going to the cinema as it does look great up on the big screen.

Most importantly, my friend who wanted to see it for her birthday, enjoyed it. It’s ok, she knows I won’t be watching the films again – once is enough for this cinephile.

Rating:  Alright

John Wick: Chapter 2

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Date watched: March 19, 2023
Date Reviewed: March 19, 2023

Review

If you’ve read my previous review for the first John Wick film, you may be surprised to find that for the second night in a row, I’ve watched the next instalment. What can I say, I’m committed to the cause. Plus, I didn’t have a lot of wiggle room in my schedule to have a night off.

Initially I was concerned as the runtime for the sequel is another 21 minutes longer and the opening sequence felt like it was going to be a rinse and repeat of the first. However, I am happy to report that I found Chapter 2 much more enjoyable than the first!

One could say a contributing factor may be that my expectations started off low and while conscious of this fact, I don’t think that’s the sole reason.

John Wick: Chapter 2 certainly followed some of the same patterns as the first instalment and for a franchise that make sense as you want to establish what your brand is about. The difference is this one feels like it has a little bit more going on. It’s a good example of a simple plot done right. They obviously had some learnings and/or more freedoms to do what they wanted in chapter 2.

There were improvements with the dialogue as well as the acting. Nice to see a bit of a Matrix reunion building with the addition of Lawrence Fishburne. At times I did find some of the dialogue ridiculous but there was more going on to district from these things which is why I don’t think I was as bothered.

I do have to make mention of the lack of women representation in the main cast that has carried over. One of the women is only included for a scene (don’t worry, not a spoiler) and the other cannot speak. I did like the idea of having a character in that world who signs, and she has a pretty high position. They could have easily cast another man in the role and I guess not many of the men in similar roles have that many lines. I’ll be interested to see how this may or may not change in the next couple of instalments, as there is room for improvement.

Now, onto the good stuff.

Again, this film is shot beautifully well. It has a very good look to it, so another kudos to the direction and cinemaphotography – it seems they have also kept the things done right! While I don’t play many video games myself anymore, these films do give off the feeling like the viewer is watching a video game play out. And I like it!

The action sequences were quite enjoyable with a wide variety on show including cars, guns, knives, and fists. Even the random explosions felt like they were done better in chapter two. Fans can also enjoy a return on the build-up of the killing three guys with a pencil story.

My last call out will go to a cameo with Peter Serafinowicz. The scene he is in has a lot of great word play and it is just a delight. Serafinowicz has a great many credits but I always remember him from roles in Black Books and Spaced. So I was happy to see him and that he was in a great scene.

This now leaves me in a tricky place on how I would rate this film. While I did enjoy it more than the first John Wick, I’m not sure that really makes it a ‘Good’ film either.

I would say that if these films are your jam, you’ll like this one but there are probably other films out there in the genre that would be better.

Rating:  Alright

Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Date watched: January 7, 2023
Date Reviewed: March 13, 2023

Review

The Robin Hood story has always been a favourite of mine and I grew up watching the Disney version from 1973 (yes, the cartoon one) and Mel Brook’s Robin Hood: Men in Tights. In later years the BBC version in 2006 also became a favourite.

Yet despite Men in Tights being on high rotation, I don’t think I’ve ever actually seen Prince of Thieves and after Netflix flogging the fact it’s now available in the UK and Ireland, I succumbed, found another streaming service it was available for in my region, and gave it a go.

So first off, Men in Tights is such a great parody. Even though I haven’t watched it for years I could clearly see what character traits and scenes were used. It’s so well done; I can’t wait to re-watch Men in Tights again.

Which now brings us back to the focus of this review. If I had to describe the film in one word, it would be; Trashtastic.

I found it so camp and over the top. By the amount of laughing, you would think this would be a comedy.

The writing was poor, as were many of the action scenes, and I found the camera angles to be quite odd at times (take a look at the scene where the Sheriff is threating to cut out Will’s tongue). I’m not sure if there were going for something creative in that regard but it was just off putting with everything else going on.

Kevin Costner in the lead role of Robin doesn’t even attempt at an English accent, so I guess that it makes sense that in the casting of King Richard they would look no further than the master of accents, Sean Connery.

I would have liked to have seen more of Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio as Maid Marion. When we are first introduced to her there is promise of a stronger role however as the film processes, the female lead mostly ends up screaming for help from her lead male actor. This is more a reflection of the time the film was released and I’m glad to see in more recent adaptions Marion having more grit.

As for other casting notations I enjoyed the casting of Michael Wincott as the Guy of Gisborne. He is a favourite of mine from other classic 90s films such as The Crow and The Three Musketeers and Christian Slater as Will Scarlett is the perfect addition of eye candy. I wonder if this is the trend that started of Will always being the hot one? If you know, leave me a comment.

However, there is only one reason that you need to watch this film and his name is Alan Rickman. The eccentric performance he gives this film gives the impression he had a lot of fun with the role. He brings a camp, horny, over the topness energy and has most of if not all the best lines. From cancelling Christmas to threatening to cut your heart out with a spoon!

It doesn’t really bode well for a film where Morgan Freeman doesn’t get a mention here and one of the best features is a Bryan Adams song.

If you are a fan of Men in Tights but haven’t seen the source material, it’s worth a one time watch to see how good a parody it is. If you are an Alan Rickman fan, same thing, good for a one time watch for the performance alone.

And if you are a fan of Robin Hood, there are better adaptions out there.

Rating:  Alright

Halloween Kills

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Date watched: October 16, 2022
Date Reviewed: October 18, 2022

Review

Halloween Kills picks up on the same night as the events from the 2018 film and really feels as if you have just hit pause, rather than starting a new film. I watched the two about 12 hours apart, so it was still fresh in my mind.

While Halloween (2018) could have been left as a stand-alone solo film, this next instalment feels like it is addressing some of the loose ends that were created, while also building upon the legend of Michael Myers – who/what he is and the relationship with Laurie and the Strode women.

I would suggest that before seeing Halloween Kills, to first watch Halloween (2018) as it will put this film into context.

If you are a fan of Halloween or any horror franchise, or just know about the common genre troupes, you’ll know it’s not a spoiler when I say to you, what fans really want to know is how Michael survives his fate from the previous film.

They basically kill him off every movie or he sustains fatal injuries, yet just does not die!

Fortunately, we don’t have to wait very long before being presented with how he escapes and survives. Look, I’ve seen much more farfetched explanations and I was ok with what was offered, simplistic as it was.

It also doesn’t take long before Michael is on a killing rampage, with increasingly more violent methods. If I thought Halloween (2018) was more violent, enter Halloween Kills which turns the dial to 11. I’m not sure how they achieved that given he turned someone’s head into a jack o’ lantern in the previous film. Michael’s kill count for this film alone is 29.

At this point I’m not really feeling any fear anymore, I just don’t want to watch a lot of what is happening on screen due to the gore factor.

What the film does do, is to explore further into the Dr. Loomis theory that the Michael is not a man but the embodiment of evil, or as Laurie labels as “the boogeyman”. The effect from the actions of the shape (which Michael has been known within the script and now also being referenced on screen) is reflected within the town of Haddonfield.

We see people living in fear, quickly turning against each other, and ultimately causing harm to an “innocent”. This fear in the town’s people hits fever pitch in a hospital scene resulting in a chaos where no one is listening to reason. The scene made me think about the recent January 6 insurrection, which I think is exactly what it was intended to do. I’m not sure it’s trying to make any political commentary per say however it definitely is saying something about the danger of conspiracy theorists and vigilantes.

By the time the end credits roll, I’m just left not knowing how I feel about the film. There were bits that I liked about it which when I reflect on, are mostly call backs to the original film. Such as having the characters of Tommy and Linsey, the kids that were babysat from the original 1978 film, included within the story.

And despite the tagline of the film “Evil dies tonight”, which we hear A LOT on repeat throughout the film, there is no doubt that Michael is still alive at the end of this one. We knew going in that this film was part of a trilogy, with the final instalment still to come.

Even though my feelings are up in the air here, I’m still excited to see the conclusion of this timeline and what happens next.

Thus, for me, Halloween Kills was not as good as Halloween (2018). If you are a fan of the series and watching this timeline of films, I think you will get some enjoyment out of it. Also if you like slasher films and in it for the gore and creative kills, I also think you’ll enjoy the film.

Rating:  Alright

Thor: Love and Thunder

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Date watched: July 9, 2022
Date Reviewed: July 16, 2022

Review

Saturday afternoon I went along to see the latest Marvel offering, which was the next instalment in the Thor series. Marvel Studios rarely put a foot wrong and while I’m a fan who is pretty much committed to seeing each new film produced, Thor: Love and Thunder seems to miss the target. While it is certainly not the worst of the films in the MCU, it’s far from the best.

In these situations, I go back to the thought of was there a story worth telling here and unfortunately, I don’t think there was. It felt like another film used as a steppingstone to introduce additional characters into the universe which is quite a shame.

My biggest issue with Thor: Love and Thunder is that there was just too much going on and I was left a little confused and uninspired. As not all the stories combined into one narrative, it just felt as if we didn’t get to fully explore any storyline to its full potential.

While I appreciate the change in direction that Taika Waititi brought to Thor: Ragnarok, for me the quirky charismatic fun films that we’ve come to love Waitiki for, is a mismatch for Thor. I think there are other characters in the MCU that could have benefited more from his style.

This is probably going to sound a little silly, but I thought the balance of humour to drama was way off. It really felt like there were too many jokes being crammed in and I’m sorry to say not all were laugh out loud moments. It was a quantity over quality feeling. I have two issues with this.

Firstly, because the balance was off, the more serious moments didn’t land the gut punch of emotion that could have been achieved. There were a few scenes that didn’t hit me as much as I thought they would have and should have.

Secondly, Marvel Studios appears to be going more in this direction across the different films. The issue isn’t so much bringing humour in. I’m a big fan of comedy and I know they are comic book films and should be light-hearted. It’s just that in doing so there runs a risk of each film losing a bit of an edge as to what makes them all different. It almost feels like they are going for the approach of bringing more appeal rather than servicing the niche that the different characters bring. I hope I’m wrong.

On the positive side of things Christian Bale and Natalie Portman both stand out in this film despite their competing storylines. Tessa Thompson as Valkyrie is a great character who unfortunately fell into the background but is still enjoyable. Also keep an eye out for several Australian actors and comedians in the background scenes of New Asgard – the bonuses of filming in Australia! The soundtrack is a banger heavily featuring Gun N’ Roses which fits to the tone of the film that was delivered.

Maybe I’m just a fan suffering from a little Marvel fatigue. Coupled with coming off great successes of ‘Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness’ and ‘Moon Knight’ that I really enjoyed, I’m a little flat.

If you enjoyed Thor: Ragnarok I think you’ll like this one too.

Rating:  Alright

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom

Reading Time: 5 minutes

Date watched: June 12, 2022
Date Reviewed: June 27, 2022

Review

This was a first time viewing for me as I missed Fallen Kingdom when it was released and just never got around to seeing it. At the time I thought that the trailer looked a little far fetched, which is a little silly because in these kind of movies where do you draw the line? If you go in with that kind of mindset, you’ll likely be disappointed.

There were some pretty radical ideas in the first Jurassic World film, so I was interested to see where this next instalment would take things. Plus it features dinosaurs and volcanoes in one movie! Hell yeah, I’m in!

The film has a fantastic opening sequence following a team that has returned to Isla Nublar on a mission to collect DNA from the Indominus Rex remains. We don’t know who they are but this can’t be a good thing right? The scene features the Tyrannosaurs Rex and Mosasaurus who we last saw in the final scenes of Jurassic World and it is one of the best starts in the franchise. We’re here to see dinosaurs and there is no time wasted!

Back in the United States, Claire has now founded the Dinosaur Protection Group (DPG) working to save the dinosaurs who are on left on the island from an impending volcanic eruption. It feels like quite a big jump for her from the events of the last film. Perhaps she feels a duty of care to the animals made for the park that she oversaw. While there might be something interesting to tap into there, instead we spend a bit of time finding out the relationship between her and Owen. Which to be fair is likely a contributing factor.

With the introduction of the DPG also includes two additional characters; Zia and Franklin. Both are great and bring energy and laughs to the film. In a way they replace Claire’s two nephews, who don’t return for this sequel.

This second instalment of Jurassic World further explores the theme of empathy towards the dinosaurs which we see in the senate hearings asking if the animals should be saved or not. Claire’s work has started in response to this with the stance that the animals deserve protection. The film also includes one of the saddest scenes in the franchise when the last ship leaving Isla Nublar after the volcano has erupted and we see a brachiosaurus left behind at the dock before collapsing in a cloud of ash. I think it had such an impact is because the brachiosaurus are usually the first dinosaurs that people see on the island which sparks the wonder and amazement. It was heart-breaking and I wasn’t expecting to feel that.

I do think they tried to push a little to far on this theme however when Blue (the last velociraptor) looks to shed a tear while Zia attempts to remove a bullet from her after being shot during an epic double cross rescue. There are so many fanciful things to the lead up to this point, so I’m not sure why a dinosaur crying pushes it over the line to me. It works though, as I’m in Blue’s corner. Yes Jurassic World has me barracking for a velociraptor. Who saw this coming 25 years after Jurassic Park first terrorised us with them? Certainly not me. This is why they say not to name things right – or you’ll form attachments. Walked right into that one.

There also appears to be more of a shift towards the “bad guys” being the ones attacked by the dinosaurs. There’s a little more satisfaction of people getting their just rewards than people running for their lives. The main characters rarely appear in any scenes where you think something bad could happen. I personally like a bit more suspense even when I know nothing will happen to the main characters but winds up making me second guess that fact, even for a split second.

Another of the themes further explored in this sequel is the exploitation of the animals by humans. Dr. Henry Wu returns and his character is almost like a supervillain. He holds such power which he uses to push his own agenda but he still needs to rely on someone else to provide funding. Making dinosaurs is expensive work. I don’t think Wu is an evil person but he does do a lot of questionable things. Is it the science of pushing what is possible that drives him and is he blind to the consequences? It’s been really enjoyable to see more of him over the last two films and I can’t see what he does next.

In this film Wu is responsible to the creation of another hybrid; the Indoraptor, which has been developed using the DNA taken from that opening sequence. It’s a prototype being show cased at a black market auction after the animals have been transported to the United States which Wu is highly aware of. He knows exactly what is going on but isn’t in control of the outcomes.

The sequence which takes place at the auction is also another incredible one. Again it does tip over into the fanciful and you kind of have to ride the wave. You though raptors opening doors 25 years ago was questionable – you ain’t seen nothing yet!

I have mixed feelings towards Fallen Kingdom. While there is plenty to like about it there, it has a number of flaws. In an action film you don’t really want to be asking a lot of questions, the amazing action sequences and dazzling science should distract you enough from thinking too much about the plausibility of what’s going on. For me the balance was a bit off.

What is exciting is that by the end of this film, the world is now in a completely different place from where we started. It leaves me excited for the conclusion in Jurassic World: Dominion.

For me, it wasn’t as good as Jurassic World and I think it could have been better.

Rating:  Alright

Jurassic Park III

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Date watched: June 10, 2022
Date Reviewed: June 24, 2022

Review

I was a little worried heading into this one as I had no memories of anything that happened in Jurassic Park III. I know I’ve definitely seen it, and likely more than once when it was initially released. However since then, this is probably the first revisit.

It’s the first of the films not to be based on a novel. Instead it uses sequences that weren’t used for either of the first two films. It’s also the first not to be directed by Steven Spielberg.

Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill) makes his return to the franchise and brings the familiarity for the fans. After all is it really Jurassic Park if you don’t have someone from the original film?

Laura Dern also makes a brief yet ultimately important appearance returning as Dr. Ellie Sattler. It really feels like her role is to establish where Alan and her are in their personal relationship; no longer together but still close. And you can’t blame them after experiencing such a traumatizing event. It would have been easy to establish this with just some dialogue, so I’m happy they got her back.

In Jurassic Park III we return to Isla Sorna, the second island we learnt about in The Lost World. Desperate for funding but not learning from lessons of the past, Alan makes a terrible decision by agreeing to accompany some strangers on an “aerial tour” as their guide.

It’s already the shortest film in the franchise but could have been much shorter had Alan just done some basic checks! At a minimum I would have been asking for a deposit and ensuring that the money cleared before going anywhere near that island. But as I have previously stated, these films run off the back of humans making stupid decisions.

For me I would have to say that the highlight of this film would be the aviary sequence. Following the attack from the spinosaurus, the group find themselves in the island’s aviary where a family of pteranodons still reside. It’s something that we haven’t seen in either of the first two films and that fans had been wanting to see. I think it delivered.

I should also point out a couple of the cheesy bits that I quite enjoyed, one being the name of the company operating the parasailing tour at the beginning of the film; Dino-soar. Love a good pun! The other being the spinosaurus ringing as the first person it ate was carrying the satellite phone. Just the image of this massive land creature producing a hideous ringtone sound from where it stands, it’s so ridiculous it makes me laugh.

In summary Jurassic Park III is an okay action flick which is overall unremarkable. It’ll be a way to fill in a night when you can’t decide on what to watch and you’ll probably end up forgetting about it in a few months.

Rating:  Alright

Operation Mincemeat

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Date watched: May 22, 2022
Date Reviewed: May 23, 2022

Review

I happened to stumble upon this film by chance. It was when I went to see The Drover’s Wife that on my out I noticed a poster for this film at the cinema. Having just watched The Man Who Never Was only a couple of days beforehand, what were the odds! A quick google confirmed that this was the same story. I immediately let the family know and we went along to the cinema yesterday to go check it out.

Unfortunately this telling of the story has missed the mark. I was hoping that as more time has passed since the events in 1943, there might be more about the story that could not have been included in 1956. While the two films have the same deception operation at heart, they are very different films. Both based on different books with quite a lot of details different, including fictional elements.

The thing that I liked about the 1956 film was the smaller cast, this newer film added some additional characters into the mix and what it has achieved is a confused mess where the true incredible story of Operation Mincemeat falls into the background. It felt as if the film was trying to tell too many stories, which may have suited better to a limited series than a film. They may have been aiming to flesh out the characters, giving them a more rounded tale of who they are but it didn’t pay off.

For example, Ewen Montagu’s brother was a communist activist for a brief time. It feels like someone thought that was an interesting fact and they have tried to jam it into this film. However in order to make it work they have fabricated a story to cause some tension between the two lead characters. The two men in real life had different backgrounds and I am sure may not have gotten along at times, as is human nature, I just can’t see why that storyline was added in.

One of things that was included in this film was the name of the man who become Major William Martin, as in 1997 his real name was finally released; Glyndwr Michael. While this film uses his real name in the search for a body, I felt the use of the actor in some scenes was disrespectful. There is a scene where they are attempting to take a photo for the false identification papers by propping up the dead body on a chair and in all photographs he looks dead. I’m not sure if this actually happened or was made up for the film but to use that for some comic element doesn’t feel right.

What I did like was the use of Ian Fleming as a character. It also feels like when the tele-movie of Fleming was put together this story was resurfaced and perhaps a catalyst for a new film. I do find it really interesting that a lot of intelligence officers at the time wrote espionage novels which is referenced in this film. There is a hilarious line where Cholmondeley states “they’re everywhere” and when questioned if Germans, he states “No, writers”. There are also a few James Bond references including a visit to Q-Branch.

We’ll probably never know exactly everything that happened given it was an intelligence operation and most of the key parties involved have since passed away. I enjoyed this version for the inclusion of Ian Fleming’s involvement and I liked the casting (who doesn’t like having two Mr Darcy’s in one film!). The use of narration in this film was also a highlight. I enjoyed the 1956 version for the use of tension on whether the operation would work and the respect to Glyndwr Michael.

Review:  Alright